Home
|
Press
|
Events
|
Eshare
Sign in
/
Register
0
Shopping Cart
X
Close
My Products (0 items)
My shopping cart is empty.
.
Sign in
/
Register
X
Close
Login/Register
Email
Password
INDUSTRIES
Agriculture
Chemicals
Food & Feed
Pesticides
Titanium Dioxide (TiO2)
Dairy Products
Full Industry List
ONLINE DATABASE
PRODUCTS & SERVICE
Products' Introduction
Industrial Reports
Newsletters
Market Data
Content Byte
Agrochemical Regulatory
Customized solutions
IMPACT FACTOR
MARKET NEWS
Agriculture
Chemicals
Food & Feed
Other
ABOUT
About CCM
Why CCM?
CCM Story
CCM Clients
Events
Career
Company news
CONTACT
Home
Product
Complimentary download
Nufarm'sresponse to IARC’s assessment of 2,4-D
Recommend Report
Need some help to find your information ?
E-mail:
econtact@cnchemicals.com
Tel: +86-20-37616606
Search Report
Agriculture
Biotechnology
Chemicals
Economics and investment and financial
Energy and utilities
Food and Feed
Food and Feed (Ingredients)
Minerals/resources/mining
Pharmaceuticals and healthcare
Printing & packaging
More Reports >>
Recommend Newsletter
Related market data
Related product
Related research
Nufarm'sresponse to IARC’s assessment of 2,4-D
Keyword:
Publish time:
23
rd
June, 2015
Source:
Laverton North, Victoria, Australia
Information collection and data processing: CCM For more information, please
contact us
Nufarm'sresponse to IARC’s assessment of 2,4-DNufarm'sresponse to IARC’s assessment of
2,4-D
" title="Share this link on Facebook">Laverton North, Victoria, AustraliaJune 23, 2015The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) – as a result of its most recent review of select data – has not changed its potential hazard classification of 2,4-D and continues to classify 2,4-D in the same group as aloe vera, coffee and pickled vegetables.2,4-D is the most researched crop protection molecule in the world, with more than 70 years continuous research that has kept pace with increasingly stringent regulatory requirements and
technical
advancements.The world’s leading regulatory agencies have not classified 2,4-D as carcinogenic and continue to assess it as being safe to use when done so according to label directions. IARC’s conclusions are a theoretical hazard assessment, as opposed to a risk assessment which is undertaken by independent regulatory agencies.In comparison to the scientific information that regulators and other governing bodies review in their assessments, IARC considers only a sub-set of the full range of available scientific findings, none of which included new or novel scientific data.
Nufarm
’s highest priority is the safety and health of our employees and users of our products. We continuously review our manufacturing and handling procedures and practices, including the assessment of any new scientific information, to help ensure the health and safety of our employees and users of Nufarm products.More news from: Nufarm Ltd.Website: http://www.cnchemicals.com/: June 23, 2015The news item on this page is copyright by the organization where it originatedFair use notice
Index Type:(required)
-- Please select --
Message:(required)
Name:(required)
Email:(required)
Tel:
Message:(required)
Name:(required)
Email:(required)
Tel: