Figure No.
|
Figure Title
|
Figure
|
I-1.2.1Output share of pesticides, 2009
|
Figure
|
I-3.1 Industry lifecycle of PGR industry
|
Figure
|
I-4.1 Barriers of entry and withdrawal of pesticide industry.
|
Figure
|
II-1.1.1 Output volume and value of PGRs in China, 2005-2009
|
Figure
|
II-1.1.2 Average price of PGR technical in China, 2005-2009
|
Figure
|
II-1.2.1 Demand and market value of PGRs in China, 2005-2009
|
Figure
|
II-1.2.2 Consumption structure of PGRs, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-1.2.3 Market share of key players by value, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-1.2.4 Product market share by value, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.1.1 Registration data of ethephon in China, 1984-2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.1.2 Ethephon registration structure of different formulation types, by Mar. 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.1.3 Production process of ethephon by four different routes
|
Figure
|
II-2.1.4 Ex-factory price of ethephon technical (85%) in China, 2005-Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.1.5 Share of ethepthon technical in China by output, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.1.6 key players’s market share of ethepthon formulations in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.1.7 Consumption structure of ethepthon formulations in crops, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.1.8 Consumption structure of ethepthon formulations by formulation types, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.2.1 Registration data of paclobutrazol in China, 1991-2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.2.2 Structure of paclobutrazol registrations by formulation type, by Mar. 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.2.3 Production process of paclobutrazol
|
Figure
|
II-2.2.4 Ex-factory price of paclobutrazol technical (95%) in China, 2005-Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.2.5 Share of paclobutrazol technical in China by output, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.2.6 Market share of paclobutrazol formulations by key players in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.2.7 Consumption structure of paclobutrazol formulations in crops, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.2.8 Consumption structure of paclobutrazol formulations by formulation types, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.3.1 Registration data of mepiquat chloride in China, 1991-2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.3.2 Structure of mepiquat chloride registrations by formulation type, by Mar. 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.3.3 Production process of mepiquat chloride
|
Figure
|
II-2.3.4 Ex-factory price of mepiquat chloride technical (98%) in China, 2005-Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.3.5 Share of mepiquat chloride technical in China by output, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.3.6 Market share of mepiquat chloride formulations by key players in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.3.7 Consumption structure of mepiquat chloride formulations in crops, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.3.8 Consumption structure of mepiquat chloride by formulation types, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.4.1 Registrations of Gibberellic acid, 1986~ Mar.2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.4.2 Ex-factory price of gibberellic acid technical (90%), 2005~Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.4.3 Output share of gibberellic acid technical producers, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.4.4 Consumption structure of gibberellic acid in crops in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.4.5 Consumption structure of gibberellic acid formulaitons in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.5.1 Registration data of uniconazole in China, 1994-2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.5.2 Formulation type structure of uniconazole registrations, by Mar. 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.5.3 Production process of uniconazole
|
Figure
|
II-2.5.4 Ex-factory price of uniconazole technical (90%) in China, 2005-Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.5.5 Share of uniconazole technical in China by output, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.5.6 Market share of uniconazole formulations by key players in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.5.7 Consumption structure of uniconazole formulations in crops, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.5.8 Consumption structure of uniconazole by formulation types, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.6.1 Registrations of thidiazuron, 2000 ~ 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.6.2 Registrations of thidiazuron formulations by does type, 2000 ~ 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.6.3 Ex-factory price ofthidiazuron technical (95%), 2005~Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.6.4 Output share of thidiazuron technical producers, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.6.5 Market share of thidiazuron formulations producers in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.6.6 Consumption structure of thidiazuron in crops in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.6.7 Consumption structure of thidiazuron formulations in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.7.1 Registrations of chlormequat, 2001 ~ Mar.2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.7.2 Registrations of chlormequat formulation by does type, 2001 ~ Mar.2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.7.3 Ex-factory price of chlormequat technical (98%), 2005~Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.7.4 Output share of chlormequat technical producers, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.7.5 Market share of chlormequat formulation producers, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.7.6 Consumption structure of chlormequat in crops in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.7.7 Consumption structure of chlormequat formulations in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.7.8 Consumption structure of chlormequat application range
|
Figure
|
II-2.8.1 Registration data of sodium nitrophenolate in China, 1989-2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.8.2 Structure of sodium nitrophenolate registrations by formulation type, by Mar. 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.8.3 Ex-factory price of sodium nitrophenolate technical (98%) in China, 2005-Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.8.4 Share of sodium nitrophenolate technical in China by output, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.8.6 Market share of sodium nitrophenolate by key players in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.8.7 Consumption structure of sodium nitrophenolate by application modes, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.8.8 Consumption structure of sodium nitrophenolate in crops, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.9.1 Registrations of brassinolide, 2000 ~ Mar.2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.9.2 Brassinolide formulation registrations of different formulation types, 2000 ~ Mar.2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.9.3 Ex-factory price of brassinolide technical (90%), 2005~Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.9.4 Output share of brassinolide technical producers, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.9.5 Market share of brassinolide formulation producers, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.9.6 Consumption structure of brassionlide in crops in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.9.7 Consumption structure of brassinolide formulations in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.9.8 Consumption structure of brassinolide application range
|
Figure
|
II-2.10.1 NAA registration number, 1986~ Mar.2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.10.2 Does type of NAA formulation registration, 1986~ Mar.2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.10.3 Ex-factory price of NAA technical (90%), 2005~Q1 2010
|
Figure
|
II-2.10.4 Output share of NAA technical producers, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.10.5 Consumption structure of NAA in crops in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.10.6 Consumption structure of NAA formulations in China, 2009
|
Figure
|
II-2.10.7 Consumption structure of NAA application range
|
Figure
|
III-1.1 Income growth of Chinese peasants, 2004-2009
|
Figure
|
III-1.2 Agricultural population in China, 2003-2009
|
Figure
|
III-1.3 Chinese government’s investment in agriculture, 2003-2009
|
Figure
|
III-2.1 China’s GDP growth, 2001-2009
|
Figure
|
III-2.2 Projection for output of PGRs in China, 2010-2014
|
Figure
|
III-2.3 Projection on average price of PGR technical in China, 2010-2014
|
Figure
|
III-2.4 Projection on output value of PGRs in China, 2010-2014
|
Figure
|
III-2.5 Projection on price of ethephon, paclobutrazol and sodium nitrophenolate (A.I.) in China, 2010-2014
|
Figure
|
III-2.6 Projection on demand of PGRs in China, 2010-2014
|